The objective of this puzzle is not to win material or find checkmate. Rather, black's objective is to gain a significant positional advantage over white. In this vein, what would you play?
For those curious, this position arose from the following move order: 1. e4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Bg5 Qb6 6. b3 Ne4 7. Bf4
# Answer / explanation:
>!Black should play the pawn sacrifice e5! To understand why this is best, lets evaluate some resulting lines after 7. Bf4 e5. The three moves we will look at are dxe5, Nxe5, and Bxe5. (**TLDR BELOW**)!< >!8. dxe5!<
>!This is the simplest line to evaluate, as dxe5 allows for Qxf2#. Clearly this move is not in white's interest.!<
>!8. Nxe5!<
>!This move takes a bit more work to assess, however to understand why the resulting position is favorable for black we must first understand why 7. ... e5 was played to begin with. One main positional gain from e5 is that it clears the way for black's dark square bishop to harass the white king. As such, after 8. Nxe5 black has the obvious 8. ... Bb4+. If white is to block the check with 9. c3, black will play 9. ... Nxc3 with the threat of a discovered attack. As such, white must capture the knight with 10. Nxc3 allowing black to recapture with the bishop and win an exchange by forking the king and rook. !<
>!You may ask why white would play 9. c3 if it quickly loses material, but in reality it's their best option. If they block black's check with 9. Bd2, it allows black to capture the pawn on d4 with 9. ... Qxd4 pinning white's bishop and again threatening mate on f2. 9. Nd2 is also ill-advised, as white's knight is now pinned. This allows black to calmly castle and threaten to explode the center while the white king is still vulnerable. !<
>!8. Bxe5!<
>!This move is white's best response to 7. ... e5, and we continue the same as before with 8. ... Bb4+. The key difference in this position is that white still has a knight on f3, and is then able to play 9. Nfd2 to block the check without fear of a fork. !< >!This is where the position becomes most instructive, as there are no clear follow ups for black to continue the attack. To decide how to continue, black must avoid associating the failure of their attack with the loss of the game. White is a pawn up, their king defended, and it seems that black has lost their chance. However, this line of thought is far too materialistic, and doesn't consider the most important factor - development! To continue, black may castle or develop their knight to f6 with plans to castle later, and white must scramble to vacate their king from the center before black can coordinate a new attack. In this time, black may look to capture the center pawns, force piece exchanges leaving white with no development, or simply pile up more pressure on the white king. Black dominates the board, and white has no great options to regain control of territory.!<
# Conclusion / TLDR:
>!All this analysis is well and good, but how do you know to spot and calculate this move to begin with? Outside of knowing e5 as a motif from similar positions, it seems like such an odd move to consider. To find it, black must recognize that accelerated development and territory control is worth far more than a pawn (even a center one!). With this idea in mind, e5 becomes far more apparent as it offers a great way to gain squares and take initiative.!<
I hope that you found this analysis helpful or interesting, and have a great rest of your day!
*(please feel free to correct me if anything is said is wrong, I'm prone to notation mistakes)* #games