Stop being the product.
Become the owner.
or
sign uplog in

Black unity existed in pockets, not as a single racial…

Black unity existed in pockets, not as a single racial collective.

When we talk about “Black unity,” I think we sometimes project a modern racial identity onto the past.
Black people were certainly united at different points in history, but usually within specific kingdoms, nations, clans, ethnic groups, communities, or political movements. That is very different from saying Black people, as one racial collective, were historically united.
Africa has always been incredibly diverse. People had different languages, cultures, political systems, identities, interests and loyalties. In many cases, those local identities were far stronger than any broader idea of racial solidarity.
Even today, the idea of universal Black unity faces the same reality: being Black does not automatically mean people share the same nationality, culture, ideology, class interests or political goals.
So when I say **“Black unity existed in pockets, not as a single racial collective,”** I’m not saying Black people never cooperated or stood together. I’m saying we should distinguish between **local unity and universal racial unity**. Those are two very different things.
#local
earnings
2,000 mlx total
$0  total
engagement
4 views
0 reactions

0 comments