My take on this $POTATCHI treasury update: π₯π This isβ¦
0 reactions
My take on this $POTATCHI treasury update: π₯π
This is bigger than just a token allocation. The part that stands out to me is the 15-year commitment β 5 years fully locked, followed by 10 years of gradual monthly vesting. Thatβs a completely different mindset from the usual short-term crypto game. π
Add the planned 30M $POTATCHI web-app reserve, broader ownership, reduced concentration, and on-chain disclosure of wallets and transactions, and you start seeing a project trying to build something that can actually survive multiple market cycles.
Transparency + long-term alignment + real utility = the kind of foundation I want to see.
Itβs still a proposal, so execution is what matters. But if the team follows through, this could be one of the most interesting developments for $POTATCHI. ππ₯π
15 years isnβt a hype cycle. Itβs a statement of intent. π
Bag now, It's Low MC Gem
CA: 0xfad17d7cc41d9c9ca4a459da798a4446dd217974
This is bigger than just a token allocation. The part that stands out to me is the 15-year commitment β 5 years fully locked, followed by 10 years of gradual monthly vesting. Thatβs a completely different mindset from the usual short-term crypto game. π
Add the planned 30M $POTATCHI web-app reserve, broader ownership, reduced concentration, and on-chain disclosure of wallets and transactions, and you start seeing a project trying to build something that can actually survive multiple market cycles.
Transparency + long-term alignment + real utility = the kind of foundation I want to see.
Itβs still a proposal, so execution is what matters. But if the team follows through, this could be one of the most interesting developments for $POTATCHI. ππ₯π
15 years isnβt a hype cycle. Itβs a statement of intent. π
Bag now, It's Low MC Gem
CA: 0xfad17d7cc41d9c9ca4a459da798a4446dd217974
| 3,000 mlx | |
| 6 | |
| 0 |