5 reactions
Korean Female Writer Wins Nobel Prize — Causes of Korea’s Cultural Flourishing and Reflections on the Decline of Chinese Culture
On October 10, 2024, the Swedish Academy announced that the 2024 Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to the South Korean writer Han Kang, making her the first Korean ever to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. Han Kang thus also became the second Korean to win a Nobel Prize after Kim Dae-jung, and the first Korean woman laureate.
In its citation, the Nobel Committee praised Han Kang “for her poetic prose that confronts historical trauma and reveals the fragility of human life.” Her works explore the Gwangju Democratization Movement, the trauma of war, women’s conditions and feminism, the vulnerability of human existence, and reflections on violence. Han Kang had previously won both the Booker Prize and the Prix Goncourt, two of the most prestigious literary honors in the world—almost on par with the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Han Kang’s Nobel is not only her personal success but also another example of the flourishing and global recognition of Korean culture. In 2020, the Korean film Parasite won the Academy Award for Best Picture, among other major honors, becoming the first Asian and first non-English-language film ever to do so.
Korea’s own cultural festivals and awards have also grown increasingly prominent and internationally recognized. The Busan International Film Festival and the Seoul International Drama Awards, among others, are celebrated throughout Asia and well known worldwide. Beyond prizes, Korean pop music, cinema, television dramas, traditional song, dance, and cuisine have spread across the globe, forming a powerful “K-wave.” Whether it is the historical drama Dae Jang Geum, the political series The Fifth Republic, or films such as A Taxi Driver, Memories of Murder, and Snowpiercer, all have generated tremendous resonance both at home and abroad.
One can say that Korea’s cultural prosperity far exceeds what might be expected from its land area or population, even surpassing its already highly developed economy. Moreover, compared with early-developed nations such as the United States, European countries, or Japan, Korea’s achievements were largely realized within roughly thirty years—from the 1990s to today—showing its astonishingly rapid progress and its momentum as a “latecomer surpassing the predecessors.”
There are many reasons behind Korea’s remarkable cultural success: its economic prosperity has provided favorable material conditions for creation; the Korean government has actively supported the cultural industry; and Korea’s cultural promotion strategies are highly sophisticated—all of which have given Korean literature and art confidence and momentum.
Yet these are not the primary reasons. The decisive factors behind Korea’s brilliant cultural achievements are its fully free creative environment, the social responsibility and compassion of its intellectuals, and the strong national sentiment, crisis consciousness, and self-reflective spirit of the Korean people.
Before the 1980s, Korea had long been under military dictatorship. Although culture existed, its development was quite limited. Under authoritarian rule and Cold War anti-communist ideology, intellectuals and their creative work were suppressed, unable to express themselves freely.
Only from the late 1980s, with Korea’s gradual democratization, did people gain full freedom of thought, speech, and creation. Taboo topics disappeared, and literature and the arts began to flourish. The tragedies and sufferings of Korean history—Japanese colonial rule, the Korean War, and military dictatorship—became widely discussed and better known. These heavy histories pierced the hearts of Koreans, especially intellectuals, who reflected deeply and cried out for the dead, the wounded, and their long-suffering nation.
The power of many Korean literary and cinematic works lies precisely in their reflection of real Korean experiences, the authors’ profound emotions, deep contemplation of tragedy, and sincere compassion for victims. Korean works excel at portraying ordinary people caught in major political events. The award-winning film A Taxi Driver, for instance, tells the story of a humble cab driver who witnesses the military’s massacre of citizens and students during the 1980 Gwangju uprising and helps a foreign journalist expose the tragedy to the world.
Korean literature and cinema not only refrain from avoiding sensitive historical topics but often depict them extensively. There are hundreds of films and dramas about the Gwangju Democratization Movement alone. Others vividly portray Japan’s brutal colonial rule (including forced labor and “comfort women”), the American occupation, the division of the peninsula and civil war, inter-Korean relations, the military government’s massacres of civilians, Park Chung-hee’s assassination and Chun Doo-hwan’s 1979 “12-12 Coup,” as well as numerous scandals such as child abuse and sexual violence. These are not “trend-chasing” works but ones of profound reflection and deep humanistic concern. While describing cruel national histories and personal sufferings, they remain sober and objective, embedding human-rights ideals and humanitarian spirit—condemning evil and praising light.
This courage to “speak out” is the key reason for Korea’s cultural vitality and achievements. Hong Kong actor Chow Yun-fat once remarked at the Busan International Film Festival: “The greatest strength of Korean cinema lies in its creative freedom and the richness of its material.” He precisely identified the essence behind Korea’s global cinematic success. Truth moves people most deeply; only free creation can fully uncover truth and convey genuine emotion.
Beyond film, Korean literature likewise wins hearts with its critiques of reality and concern for the marginalized. Han Kang’s newly awarded works focus on women’s conditions, marginal lives, and war trauma; older masters such as Hwang Sok-yong (The Guest) and Cho Jung-rae (The Taebaek Mountains) wrote about workers, farmers, marginalized citizens, war victims, and those oppressed under dictatorship. Their writing is profound and passionate, evoking wide resonance.
Korean intellectuals’ strong national consciousness, patriotism, and concern for the people also drive their prolific, high-quality output. Having endured hardship and survived between great powers, Koreans possess an acute sense of crisis and internal cohesion, which stimulate reflection on national destiny, empathy for compatriots, and questioning of human nature. Through literature and film, they remember history, reflect on disasters, call for justice and peace, console the dead, and warn posterity. These memories and reflections transcend Korea itself, embodying universal humanitarian values. As Han Kang once said, “Writing is like lighting a match and watching the flame burn until it goes out. In that moment of watching, one questions humanity and life.”
Korean literature and cinema are also marked by self-criticism and introspection. While loving their nation, Korean intellectuals never conceal its scandals; instead, they see exposing darkness and criticizing vice as a patriotic act.
For example, the film The Fortress (Namhan Sanseong) portrays the ancient Joseon king kneeling to Jurchen conquerors and debates the merits of surrender versus resistance. It even depicts a Korean slave who helps the invaders and, when questioned by officials, retorts, “In Joseon, are slaves considered human?”—revealing oppression within the Korean people themselves.
The film Silenced (Dogani) exposes the sexual abuse of disabled children in a special-needs school and the collusion of bureaucrats and officials—its revelation of cruelty and hypocrisy resonated strongly with Chinese audiences.
The Whistleblower (Jeonjaeng) dramatizes the real-life scientific fraud of Hwang Woo-suk, praising truth-seekers and whistleblowers while condemning the pursuit of national pride through deceit—asserting that genuine pride must rest on truth.
The Attorney depicts a human-rights lawyer during the military regime who defends students arrested for activism and denounces the junta’s persecution under the guise of “patriotism” and “national security.” Its memorable lines include: “To serve a dictatorship is not patriotism; it is being a parasite of a corrupted nation, a helper of a filthy military regime. Speaking the truth—that is real patriotism,” and “The state is the people,” and “Rock, however hard, is dead; the egg, however fragile, is living.”
Silmi Island tells of a secret commando unit trained to assassinate Kim Il-sung. Abandoned by their superiors and about to be eliminated, they rebel, seize vehicles, and storm Seoul demanding justice—ending in their massacre. The story is also based on real events.
……
Korean cinema’s fearless exposure and reflection upon its own nation’s dark sides are extraordinarily valuable and admirable—few other countries come close. The sharpness and moral force of Korea’s critical works often surpass even the self-reflective traditions of Europe and America. Korean intellectuals truly embody the principle “the deeper the love, the harsher the critique.”
Some Korean films have even led to tangible legal and social change. After Silenced sparked public outrage, courts retried the perpetrators of the real case, and the National Assembly enacted tougher laws against sexual abuse and to protect minors and the disabled—known as the “Silenced Act.” Another film, Hope (Sowon), depicting a young girl’s sexual assault, had a similar impact. Korean literature and cinema exert a subtle yet profound influence on people’s values, shaping the nation’s moral compass—an impact that is itself real social change.
Korean intellectuals cultivate emotion through sorrow, dissect evil through reflection, seek solutions amid crises, and find hope amid despair—creating astonishing, passionate, and great works. Parasite’s Oscar and Han Kang’s Nobel crown are well-deserved tributes to the individuals, to Korea’s cultural community, and to the Korean nation as a whole.
By contrast, across the sea, China—with its 1.4 billion people and five-thousand-year history—has grown dim in recent years in culture and the arts. Chinese films lack the boldness, breadth, and global reach of Korean ones; Chinese literature too has been relatively quiet. Although Mo Yan won a Nobel Prize more than a decade ago and some other Chinese works have briefly shone, such moments are few and disproportionate to China’s enormous scale. Those who dare to speak, and the works they produce, often lack the depth, dialectical thought, and progressiveness seen in foreign intellectuals and creations.
The root cause lies in China’s insufficient freedom of speech and creative freedom. Although the Chinese land and people possess a long, complex, and tragic-heroic history capable of moving the world, they cannot recall or express it freely. Many Chinese have even lost the courage and will to speak; countless stories and figures that could touch humanity remain buried; people suffer humiliation and pain in silence.
In an environment where thought and expression are suppressed, outstanding works can scarcely emerge; culture declines and humanity withers. The destruction of freedom and independent thought cripples reasoning and judgment. Even those who dare to speak often fail to perceive or articulate truth accurately, or fall into another form of distortion—an equal tragedy. In the foreseeable future, China’s creative realm will remain lifeless, and its citizens, including intellectuals, largely dazed and apathetic.
Korea’s cultural vitality and achievement surpass not only mainland China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan. Though these regions once shone brightly, they have now fallen relatively silent. Hong Kong’s cultural decline—its once world-influential cinema fading into obscurity—likewise stems from shrinking freedoms. Chow Yun-fat, who praised Korea’s creative liberty, also lamented Hong Kong’s current restrictions on free artistic expression. In short, Korea has overtaken its peers, becoming East Asia’s most dynamic and influential cultural powerhouse, with both high and popular art thriving side by side.
As a Chinese observer who holds deep affection for Korea and has watched many of its serious films, I feel sincere respect and admiration for Han Kang’s Nobel victory and Korea’s remarkable cultural achievements in recent years. Ancient Chinese culture once radiated brilliance across the Korean Peninsula, Japan, Southeast Asia, and even Europe; remnants of Han civilization and Chinese characters still abound in Korea today. The thousand-year civilization of the Korean Peninsula and the cultural achievements of the modern Republic of Korea are fruits born of absorbing, refining, and reinventing Chinese culture on local soil.
Today Korea has surpassed China. The Chinese people should be humble and reflective, learning from Korea’s strengths in institutions, culture, and social ethos—especially its open creative environment, its courage to face darkness and critique reality, and its humanistic concern for the weak and marginalized—so that Chinese lives and destinies may again be seen by the world, reason and emotion may find expression, and Chinese civilization may regain vitality.
#entertainment
On October 10, 2024, the Swedish Academy announced that the 2024 Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to the South Korean writer Han Kang, making her the first Korean ever to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. Han Kang thus also became the second Korean to win a Nobel Prize after Kim Dae-jung, and the first Korean woman laureate.
In its citation, the Nobel Committee praised Han Kang “for her poetic prose that confronts historical trauma and reveals the fragility of human life.” Her works explore the Gwangju Democratization Movement, the trauma of war, women’s conditions and feminism, the vulnerability of human existence, and reflections on violence. Han Kang had previously won both the Booker Prize and the Prix Goncourt, two of the most prestigious literary honors in the world—almost on par with the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Han Kang’s Nobel is not only her personal success but also another example of the flourishing and global recognition of Korean culture. In 2020, the Korean film Parasite won the Academy Award for Best Picture, among other major honors, becoming the first Asian and first non-English-language film ever to do so.
Korea’s own cultural festivals and awards have also grown increasingly prominent and internationally recognized. The Busan International Film Festival and the Seoul International Drama Awards, among others, are celebrated throughout Asia and well known worldwide. Beyond prizes, Korean pop music, cinema, television dramas, traditional song, dance, and cuisine have spread across the globe, forming a powerful “K-wave.” Whether it is the historical drama Dae Jang Geum, the political series The Fifth Republic, or films such as A Taxi Driver, Memories of Murder, and Snowpiercer, all have generated tremendous resonance both at home and abroad.
One can say that Korea’s cultural prosperity far exceeds what might be expected from its land area or population, even surpassing its already highly developed economy. Moreover, compared with early-developed nations such as the United States, European countries, or Japan, Korea’s achievements were largely realized within roughly thirty years—from the 1990s to today—showing its astonishingly rapid progress and its momentum as a “latecomer surpassing the predecessors.”
There are many reasons behind Korea’s remarkable cultural success: its economic prosperity has provided favorable material conditions for creation; the Korean government has actively supported the cultural industry; and Korea’s cultural promotion strategies are highly sophisticated—all of which have given Korean literature and art confidence and momentum.
Yet these are not the primary reasons. The decisive factors behind Korea’s brilliant cultural achievements are its fully free creative environment, the social responsibility and compassion of its intellectuals, and the strong national sentiment, crisis consciousness, and self-reflective spirit of the Korean people.
Before the 1980s, Korea had long been under military dictatorship. Although culture existed, its development was quite limited. Under authoritarian rule and Cold War anti-communist ideology, intellectuals and their creative work were suppressed, unable to express themselves freely.
Only from the late 1980s, with Korea’s gradual democratization, did people gain full freedom of thought, speech, and creation. Taboo topics disappeared, and literature and the arts began to flourish. The tragedies and sufferings of Korean history—Japanese colonial rule, the Korean War, and military dictatorship—became widely discussed and better known. These heavy histories pierced the hearts of Koreans, especially intellectuals, who reflected deeply and cried out for the dead, the wounded, and their long-suffering nation.
The power of many Korean literary and cinematic works lies precisely in their reflection of real Korean experiences, the authors’ profound emotions, deep contemplation of tragedy, and sincere compassion for victims. Korean works excel at portraying ordinary people caught in major political events. The award-winning film A Taxi Driver, for instance, tells the story of a humble cab driver who witnesses the military’s massacre of citizens and students during the 1980 Gwangju uprising and helps a foreign journalist expose the tragedy to the world.
Korean literature and cinema not only refrain from avoiding sensitive historical topics but often depict them extensively. There are hundreds of films and dramas about the Gwangju Democratization Movement alone. Others vividly portray Japan’s brutal colonial rule (including forced labor and “comfort women”), the American occupation, the division of the peninsula and civil war, inter-Korean relations, the military government’s massacres of civilians, Park Chung-hee’s assassination and Chun Doo-hwan’s 1979 “12-12 Coup,” as well as numerous scandals such as child abuse and sexual violence. These are not “trend-chasing” works but ones of profound reflection and deep humanistic concern. While describing cruel national histories and personal sufferings, they remain sober and objective, embedding human-rights ideals and humanitarian spirit—condemning evil and praising light.
This courage to “speak out” is the key reason for Korea’s cultural vitality and achievements. Hong Kong actor Chow Yun-fat once remarked at the Busan International Film Festival: “The greatest strength of Korean cinema lies in its creative freedom and the richness of its material.” He precisely identified the essence behind Korea’s global cinematic success. Truth moves people most deeply; only free creation can fully uncover truth and convey genuine emotion.
Beyond film, Korean literature likewise wins hearts with its critiques of reality and concern for the marginalized. Han Kang’s newly awarded works focus on women’s conditions, marginal lives, and war trauma; older masters such as Hwang Sok-yong (The Guest) and Cho Jung-rae (The Taebaek Mountains) wrote about workers, farmers, marginalized citizens, war victims, and those oppressed under dictatorship. Their writing is profound and passionate, evoking wide resonance.
Korean intellectuals’ strong national consciousness, patriotism, and concern for the people also drive their prolific, high-quality output. Having endured hardship and survived between great powers, Koreans possess an acute sense of crisis and internal cohesion, which stimulate reflection on national destiny, empathy for compatriots, and questioning of human nature. Through literature and film, they remember history, reflect on disasters, call for justice and peace, console the dead, and warn posterity. These memories and reflections transcend Korea itself, embodying universal humanitarian values. As Han Kang once said, “Writing is like lighting a match and watching the flame burn until it goes out. In that moment of watching, one questions humanity and life.”
Korean literature and cinema are also marked by self-criticism and introspection. While loving their nation, Korean intellectuals never conceal its scandals; instead, they see exposing darkness and criticizing vice as a patriotic act.
For example, the film The Fortress (Namhan Sanseong) portrays the ancient Joseon king kneeling to Jurchen conquerors and debates the merits of surrender versus resistance. It even depicts a Korean slave who helps the invaders and, when questioned by officials, retorts, “In Joseon, are slaves considered human?”—revealing oppression within the Korean people themselves.
The film Silenced (Dogani) exposes the sexual abuse of disabled children in a special-needs school and the collusion of bureaucrats and officials—its revelation of cruelty and hypocrisy resonated strongly with Chinese audiences.
The Whistleblower (Jeonjaeng) dramatizes the real-life scientific fraud of Hwang Woo-suk, praising truth-seekers and whistleblowers while condemning the pursuit of national pride through deceit—asserting that genuine pride must rest on truth.
The Attorney depicts a human-rights lawyer during the military regime who defends students arrested for activism and denounces the junta’s persecution under the guise of “patriotism” and “national security.” Its memorable lines include: “To serve a dictatorship is not patriotism; it is being a parasite of a corrupted nation, a helper of a filthy military regime. Speaking the truth—that is real patriotism,” and “The state is the people,” and “Rock, however hard, is dead; the egg, however fragile, is living.”
Silmi Island tells of a secret commando unit trained to assassinate Kim Il-sung. Abandoned by their superiors and about to be eliminated, they rebel, seize vehicles, and storm Seoul demanding justice—ending in their massacre. The story is also based on real events.
……
Korean cinema’s fearless exposure and reflection upon its own nation’s dark sides are extraordinarily valuable and admirable—few other countries come close. The sharpness and moral force of Korea’s critical works often surpass even the self-reflective traditions of Europe and America. Korean intellectuals truly embody the principle “the deeper the love, the harsher the critique.”
Some Korean films have even led to tangible legal and social change. After Silenced sparked public outrage, courts retried the perpetrators of the real case, and the National Assembly enacted tougher laws against sexual abuse and to protect minors and the disabled—known as the “Silenced Act.” Another film, Hope (Sowon), depicting a young girl’s sexual assault, had a similar impact. Korean literature and cinema exert a subtle yet profound influence on people’s values, shaping the nation’s moral compass—an impact that is itself real social change.
Korean intellectuals cultivate emotion through sorrow, dissect evil through reflection, seek solutions amid crises, and find hope amid despair—creating astonishing, passionate, and great works. Parasite’s Oscar and Han Kang’s Nobel crown are well-deserved tributes to the individuals, to Korea’s cultural community, and to the Korean nation as a whole.
By contrast, across the sea, China—with its 1.4 billion people and five-thousand-year history—has grown dim in recent years in culture and the arts. Chinese films lack the boldness, breadth, and global reach of Korean ones; Chinese literature too has been relatively quiet. Although Mo Yan won a Nobel Prize more than a decade ago and some other Chinese works have briefly shone, such moments are few and disproportionate to China’s enormous scale. Those who dare to speak, and the works they produce, often lack the depth, dialectical thought, and progressiveness seen in foreign intellectuals and creations.
The root cause lies in China’s insufficient freedom of speech and creative freedom. Although the Chinese land and people possess a long, complex, and tragic-heroic history capable of moving the world, they cannot recall or express it freely. Many Chinese have even lost the courage and will to speak; countless stories and figures that could touch humanity remain buried; people suffer humiliation and pain in silence.
In an environment where thought and expression are suppressed, outstanding works can scarcely emerge; culture declines and humanity withers. The destruction of freedom and independent thought cripples reasoning and judgment. Even those who dare to speak often fail to perceive or articulate truth accurately, or fall into another form of distortion—an equal tragedy. In the foreseeable future, China’s creative realm will remain lifeless, and its citizens, including intellectuals, largely dazed and apathetic.
Korea’s cultural vitality and achievement surpass not only mainland China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan. Though these regions once shone brightly, they have now fallen relatively silent. Hong Kong’s cultural decline—its once world-influential cinema fading into obscurity—likewise stems from shrinking freedoms. Chow Yun-fat, who praised Korea’s creative liberty, also lamented Hong Kong’s current restrictions on free artistic expression. In short, Korea has overtaken its peers, becoming East Asia’s most dynamic and influential cultural powerhouse, with both high and popular art thriving side by side.
As a Chinese observer who holds deep affection for Korea and has watched many of its serious films, I feel sincere respect and admiration for Han Kang’s Nobel victory and Korea’s remarkable cultural achievements in recent years. Ancient Chinese culture once radiated brilliance across the Korean Peninsula, Japan, Southeast Asia, and even Europe; remnants of Han civilization and Chinese characters still abound in Korea today. The thousand-year civilization of the Korean Peninsula and the cultural achievements of the modern Republic of Korea are fruits born of absorbing, refining, and reinventing Chinese culture on local soil.
Today Korea has surpassed China. The Chinese people should be humble and reflective, learning from Korea’s strengths in institutions, culture, and social ethos—especially its open creative environment, its courage to face darkness and critique reality, and its humanistic concern for the weak and marginalized—so that Chinese lives and destinies may again be seen by the world, reason and emotion may find expression, and Chinese civilization may regain vitality.
#entertainment
| 11,000 mlx | |
| 17 | |
| 5 |