How would you decide if an erring employee can be held…
37 reactions
How would you decide if an erring employee can be held liable for one offense? Or more …
1. Give them the notice to explain;
2. Appraised of their offense committed;
3. Wait for their answer/defense/argument;
4. Then a resolution based on substantial evidence for administrative case while “proof beyond reasonable doubt “ for criminal cases.
1. Give them the notice to explain;
2. Appraised of their offense committed;
3. Wait for their answer/defense/argument;
4. Then a resolution based on substantial evidence for administrative case while “proof beyond reasonable doubt “ for criminal cases.
5
4
1
1
| 122,000 mlx | |
| 46 | |
| 37 |
comments
A very solid framework for handling workplace discipline fairly. It's all about following the right steps to ensure justice for both the company and the employee. You have a very clear 4-step process. In your experience, which of these steps do companies usually struggle with the most? 🤔
1
1
1
1
1
Actually all of those four aforementioned, but still the owner is the final decision if he says turn the person into evil make the reputation bad then i have to close my eyes and follow what he says, but if he says otherwise even someone is liable then i just have to follow... but most of the time number 3 is the best food for our conscience to allow someone to be heard.
1
1
1
1
1
That’s a powerful way to put it—'food for our conscience.' It sounds like you take the human element of your job seriously, even when the hierarchy makes it difficult. Ensuring someone is heard (Step 3) might not change the owner's decision, but it certainly changes how that person feels seen in a difficult moment. Kudos to you for holding onto that.
1
1
1
1
1
That’s a solid approach! Step-by-step accountability is key. Giving the employee a chance to explain, clearly communicating the offense, listening to their defense, and then making a decision based on evidence ensures fairness.
I agree, administrative cases rely on substantial evidence, while criminal cases require proof beyond reasonable doubt. This method balances justice with due process. ⚖️
I agree, administrative cases rely on substantial evidence, while criminal cases require proof beyond reasonable doubt. This method balances justice with due process. ⚖️
1
1
1
1
1