If everything is meaningless and questionable according to postmodernism and deconstruction then what is the point of deconstructing and taking a postmodernist take?
If a person has to write a paper to analyse using postmodernist lens isn't the person still following regulations, time constraints, and hierarchies that postmodernism breaks?
Is it ever possible for postmodernism to be applied in real life without being utopic or dystopic?
What I mean to say is that deconstruction itself contructs what it means.
What I am thinking needs to be refined by reading, isn't reading words meaning I follow the rules of the language that signify a meaning? And the act of the disciplined and consistent reading also a rule to follow to be informed about deconstruction to deconstruct?