I’m bullish on AI but got burned in '22. So I studied Pets.com
# Context
* I’m heavily invested in tech. My #1 holding is Alphabet, and I’ve been considering adding more (Microsoft, etc.) * I’ve been burned before. In 2022 I went way too hard into SPACs that are down 70-99% (Latch, Opendoor), and I lost money in speculative shitcoins too. * Recently I was talking to my mum’s friend. One of the pivotal moments in her life was investing life savings (about 2/3 of an average house in the suburb she willing living at the time) into internet stocks in the lead-up to 2000. She lost basically everything.
The conversation prompted these questions:
* How can I be so bullish on AI now when I've been burnt recently? * Should I just stick to stable companies / the S&P500?
So I decided to explore past market manias and the parallels to AI. I've done some research on Pets.com http://Pets.com \- timeline, a few management/media quotes, and the unit economics/financials.
* Nov '98 Website launched * Mar '99 Hummer Winblad, Bowman Capital, and Amazon invest $10.5M. Amazon owns 50% of the company.
Jeff Bezos
>We invest only in companies that share our passion for customers. Pets.com http://Pets.com has a leading market position, and its proven management team is dedicated to a great customer experience…
>I am deeply saddened by this event. It is well known that this is a very, very difficult environment for business-to-consumer Internet companies.
# Financials
They IPOed at $300M market capitalisation, peaked at $400M. Annual sales at IPO is less than $1M, however they did scale to revenues to \~$35M annual run-rate. Sales/Price ratio was 300X-10X. Their operating losses were ridiculous (see below).
* At IPO filing period (9mth period in '99): $619K revenue and $20M loss. * One year later (9mth period in '00): $26M revenue and $87M loss. * They spent $60M on marketing + sales in the first 9mths of 2000. They bought a Super Bowl ad... * Unit economics: sold merchandise \~27% below cost...Wild. There's argument that driving adoption and decreasing logistics costs will eventually lead to a positive gross profit...but still.. * Customers by shutdown: **570,000** * Eyeballs looked great on paper: most visited online pet store, 1.8M annual visitors
# Potential Lessons For Investing In AI
* Even the greats got it very wrong. Jeff Bezos / Amazon lost significant amounts investing in Pets.com http://Pets.com * Pets.com http://Pets.com didn't look ridiculous at that time - growing industry, massive obvious markets, ridiculous top-line growth, ridiculous traffic metrics * Profit matters. And if you can't profit early-on, then having enough cash to burn matters #business source