The Framing of Favoritism I've seen a lot of hate and…
0 reactions
The Framing of Favoritism
I've seen a lot of hate and accusations of rigging the tournament and robbing games go towards Argentina, like everyone else I'm sure.
Since, at this point, I think it's pointless to argue if the VAR decisions are correct, I think most people can admit they were technically correct. So, the argument is basically that is seems Argentina get more favorable VAR decisions than other teams...
My question is if this framing in itself is biased. VAR is meant to flag clear and obvious error the ref made in the game. Another way to frame this is that Argentina seems to be the team the ref keeps missing things for, they miss fouls leads to goals on Argentina and they miss no contact simulations.
Then, we see random statistics like Argentina have a high (but not the highest, proper sources will confirm) foul to yellow card rate, as if they're not a team that likes to do tactical fouls, as if they don't have an aggressive style of play. Another statistic is the amount of penalties Argentina gets... these are all VAR checked. I've yet to see a penalty decision I fully disagree with for Argentina (Mbappe's though...). Maybe because they dribble in tight spaces and they press, they're not a low block teams and they like to maintain possession.
I'm posting this here because I'm not trying to convince anyone who has made their minds up about Argentina robbing and rigging. More, to give Argentina and Messi fans that might be feeling bad about the apparent biases the sense that whatever errors there may have been has been affected by biased framing from the start. If there was a problem, the narrative of favoritism just clouds the objective review of the actual rules.
source
I've seen a lot of hate and accusations of rigging the tournament and robbing games go towards Argentina, like everyone else I'm sure.
Since, at this point, I think it's pointless to argue if the VAR decisions are correct, I think most people can admit they were technically correct. So, the argument is basically that is seems Argentina get more favorable VAR decisions than other teams...
My question is if this framing in itself is biased. VAR is meant to flag clear and obvious error the ref made in the game. Another way to frame this is that Argentina seems to be the team the ref keeps missing things for, they miss fouls leads to goals on Argentina and they miss no contact simulations.
Then, we see random statistics like Argentina have a high (but not the highest, proper sources will confirm) foul to yellow card rate, as if they're not a team that likes to do tactical fouls, as if they don't have an aggressive style of play. Another statistic is the amount of penalties Argentina gets... these are all VAR checked. I've yet to see a penalty decision I fully disagree with for Argentina (Mbappe's though...). Maybe because they dribble in tight spaces and they press, they're not a low block teams and they like to maintain possession.
I'm posting this here because I'm not trying to convince anyone who has made their minds up about Argentina robbing and rigging. More, to give Argentina and Messi fans that might be feeling bad about the apparent biases the sense that whatever errors there may have been has been affected by biased framing from the start. If there was a problem, the narrative of favoritism just clouds the objective review of the actual rules.
source
| 3,000 mlx | |
| 3 | |
| 0 |