Stop being the product.
Become the owner.
or
sign uplog in

Looking for feedback on unit prefix mistakes you see in…

Looking for feedback on unit prefix mistakes you see in your field

I've been working on a chrome extension that flags suspicious unit prefixes in datasheets and specs, things like "10 mF" that should probably be µF, or "0.005 m" that's almost certainly 5 mm.
It started because I kept catching these errors in component specs and wondered how many I was missing. Now I'm trying to figure out what other prefix mistakes are common across different engineering disciplines.


What I'm hoping to learn from you:
What unit prefix errors do you run into most often in your work?

Are there industry-specific conventions that might look wrong to an outsider but are actually valid? (trying to avoid false positives)

Any "gotchas" in your field — conversions or unit pairs that trip people up?


I've built it into a Chrome extension that's free if anyone wants to try it and tell me what it catches (or misses):

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/unit-prefix-sanity-checke/bojhddjdbnmkjoloafgbenlbcpomihnp
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/unit-prefix-sanity-checke/bojhddjdbnmkjoloafgbenlbcpomihnp

Currently covers electrical, mechanical, HVAC, data, chemical, optical, and angular units — but I'm sure there are gaps. Appreciate any input.

Here's a demo page with examples that will trigger the extension.


Capacitors
10 mF, 100 mF, 0.1 mF

HIGH — mF almost always means µF

MCU specs
16000 kHz, 0.02 A, 512 kb

MEDIUM — kHz→MHz, A→mA, bits vs bytes

Mechanical
0.085 m, 0.003 m, Ra = 1.6 mm

HIGH — m→mm, surface finish in mm
Battery

3.7 mAh, 50 W battery

HIGH — mAh typo, W vs Wh

Network
100 Mb, 1000 Mbps, 256 MiB

INFO — bits vs bytes awareness

HVAC
0.001 bar, 12000 BTU/h, 72 °F

HIGH/INFO — bar→mbar, conversions

Power
12000 mV, 1500 VA, 50 Vpp

HIGH/INFO — mV→V, VA≠W

Optical
0.55 µm green light

HIGH — visible light is nm not µm
#industry
earnings
2,000 mlx total
$0  total
engagement
2 views
0 reactions

0 comments