Yes, nuisance is present in this situation. The strong toxic smell coming from the wall is interfering with A’s ability to comfortably use the alley as a public pathway. Even though it may seem minor, repeated exposure to unpleasant or harmful odors affects a person’s daily activity and well-being. This makes it a form of nuisance because it disrupts normal use of the space.
Scene 2:
In this case, the party responsible would most likely be the local authorities or the entity responsible for road maintenance . Roads are meant to be safe for public use, and a large, unrepaired hole is a clear hazard. Their failure to fix or properly warn drivers about the danger led to the accident. Therefore, they can be held accountable for negligence and creating a public nuisance.
Scene 3:
C can be held responsible for her own actions because she knowingly entered a property that was not hers without permission. However, D may also share some responsibility if the gate was left open and the pool was not properly secured, especially since pools can be dangerous. Property owners have a duty to ensure safety measures are in place to prevent accidents. So, in this situation, responsibility can be shared between both C and D.