1. Scene 1 â Was there a war crime? Yes, technically it could be considered theft, because Buzz took items from the grocery store without the ownerâs permission. However, morally, he gave them to starving children, which complicates the legal interpretation. In strict legal terms, taking property without consent is a crime, even during wartime, unless authorized by military necessity. 2. Scene 2 â Was taking the car justifiable? Yes, Beezâs action can be considered justifiable under necessity. He took the car for a medical emergency (to reach the hospital) and later gave it to you, noting that the owner had passed away. This is an example of necessity defense, where the act was done to prevent greater harm. 3. Explanation â âWhen there is no crime punishing the military, then no crime is committedâ This means that if military personnel are legally exempt or authorized to take certain actions during war, then those actions are not treated as crimes, even if they would normally be illegal. War laws and rules of engagement define what is permissible for soldiers.