Stopped applying to 50 jobs a week and started applying to…
0 reactions
Stopped applying to 50 jobs a week and started applying to 5 with customized materials. Got 3 interviews in 2 weeks.
I spent 3 months applying to 40-50 jobs per week using the spray-and-pray method. Quick apply, generic resume, generic cover letter. Results: 2 interviews out of roughly 500+ applications. Both went nowhere.
I was burned out and frustrated. Then a friend who works in HR told me something blunt: hiring managers can tell within 10 seconds if an application is generic. They see hundreds of them. Yours isn't special just because you applied.
So I tried the opposite approach. I picked 5 jobs per week maximum. For each one I:
\- Actually read the full job description and identified the 3 most important requirements
\- Rewrote my resume summary to directly address those requirements using similar language
\- Wrote a short cover letter that specifically mentioned the company and why I wanted THAT role, not just any role
\- Found the hiring manager on LinkedIn and sent a brief, professional message saying I'd applied and was genuinely interested
Results: 3 interviews in the first 2 weeks. One led to a final round. The quality of conversations was completely different too. Interviewers referenced specific things from my cover letter.
The math actually makes sense when you think about it. A 1% response rate on 500 generic applications gives you 5 responses. A 30% response rate on 15 targeted applications gives you 4-5 responses. Same result, fraction of the effort, and the conversations are better because you actually know what the company does.
If you're in the job search grind right now, I know it feels counterintuitive to apply to fewer jobs. But quality really does beat quantity here.
What approach has worked for others? Curious to hear different strategies.
#business
source
I spent 3 months applying to 40-50 jobs per week using the spray-and-pray method. Quick apply, generic resume, generic cover letter. Results: 2 interviews out of roughly 500+ applications. Both went nowhere.
I was burned out and frustrated. Then a friend who works in HR told me something blunt: hiring managers can tell within 10 seconds if an application is generic. They see hundreds of them. Yours isn't special just because you applied.
So I tried the opposite approach. I picked 5 jobs per week maximum. For each one I:
\- Actually read the full job description and identified the 3 most important requirements
\- Rewrote my resume summary to directly address those requirements using similar language
\- Wrote a short cover letter that specifically mentioned the company and why I wanted THAT role, not just any role
\- Found the hiring manager on LinkedIn and sent a brief, professional message saying I'd applied and was genuinely interested
Results: 3 interviews in the first 2 weeks. One led to a final round. The quality of conversations was completely different too. Interviewers referenced specific things from my cover letter.
The math actually makes sense when you think about it. A 1% response rate on 500 generic applications gives you 5 responses. A 30% response rate on 15 targeted applications gives you 4-5 responses. Same result, fraction of the effort, and the conversations are better because you actually know what the company does.
If you're in the job search grind right now, I know it feels counterintuitive to apply to fewer jobs. But quality really does beat quantity here.
What approach has worked for others? Curious to hear different strategies.
#business
source
| 4,000 mlx | |
| 4 | |
| 0 |