Stop being the product.
Become the owner.
or
sign uplog in

TLDR; Ask yourself big questions to get bigger results. 1️⃣…

TLDR; Ask yourself big questions to get bigger results.

1️⃣ Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic is reportedly telling colleagues that "Anthropic will be the only company in the world. It will be Anthropic and governments, that's it."

🤯 When I heard that, it ignited a thought exercise. Ignore whether Dario is right or wrong or whether it should happen, and stipulate that he's right and it will happen. Then ask yourself what capabilities would a company need to have to replace EVERY other company in the world? Window washers, lemonade stands, wedding planners, corn farmers...everything.

The list of capabilities is actually pretty small: Super intelligence (AI), sensory inputs (cams / mics etc) and the ability to manipulate atoms (robotics / mining / manufacturing). If you have those three things at lower cost and higher quality long enough, you could achieve corporate singularity.

👉 Then the question is: what capabilities would Tangled need to be the only tool on the planet for digital communication for humans and systems?
loved
19
shocked
9
laughed
3
badge
2
badge
2
badge
2
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
badge
1
earnings
3,203,000 mlx total
$0  total
engagement
112 views
90 reactions

14 comments

badge
$0 earned1mo ago
Tangled.com the air we breathe
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
Do what Elon does and than make it better. Try to build an everything-app but give it an extremly high privacy. Pardon me if my english is wrong, but it 2 after midnight.
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
I think all that is needed to control everything about the future is a public willing to place a chip in their brain. Reality isn't created and controlled by what people interact with, but by what people believe they're interacting with. You don't need window washers, lemonade stands, wedding planners, or corn farmers if everything in the world is built upon a virtual engine. A camera could be connected directly to the visual centers of the brain, while microphones could transmit directly to the inner ear. Society has been slowly walked this far down the Technocratic Future road, so why wouldn't human beings eventually accept a full version of The Matrix?

I believe Tangled would require repetition. Repetition is how people are moved in advanced societies. Repetitive exposure, in my opinion, is the key to mass adoption. Or perhaps the simpler answer is *Trust*. Human beings would have to be convinced that they should trust AI more than they trust themselves. If and when this happens, Price becomes King of the world... 👑😁
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
The capability I think Tangled would need is to become a universal trust + communication layer.

Not just a place where humans post and interact, but a network where humans, AI agents, businesses and machines can communicate, transact, verify identity and exchange
Value seamlessly.

Imagine one ecosystem where:
* Humans communicate with humans
* Humans communicate with AI
* AI agents communicate with each other.
* Businesses interact directly with customers and systems.
* Digital identity and reputation are portable.
* Payments and micropayments happen natively.
* Information and value can move without relying on multiple disconnected platforms.

If Tangled can combine communication + identity +AI + payments + decentralized infrastructure +interoperability into one open network, then it wouldn't simply compete with social media.

It could become the communication layer between people and intelligent systems.

That's when " the only tool on the planet" starts becoming a realistic thought experiment. 😊

good day
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
good question 🫣
random quick thoughts about the basics :

availability, independence, flexibility , reliability , accuracy , security , adaptability, authenticity ... same critical requirements for sensors and micro-electronics ... also for any complex system

solid plans (not only 1 plan ) with high risk management ,executable with lowest costs , secure communication / messaging servuices (audio, video, encryption.. ) , real independence and decentralization ( no intrusions with no exceptions ... not easy from the US ) ...

tangled should not be promoted as earning platform only ( will bring more bots than real humans , wont help for expansion and content will be repulsive ) ... free speech platform that pay users and creativity ... be and get paid , not pretend and take what you find.
in return , enhanced privacy and users data protection , vip user experience , easy use and 24/7 support service .... community with qualities .

solid distribution / tokenomics / roadmap with clear milestones .. financial reports and data sheets ... users, investors and partners love and trust transparency and step by step progress...

the DAG , i think it's better than the others , its speed and low cost are priceless , beside the storage capability , it's a solid key for multi projects . . .



free espresso machines and snacks , ram as consultant of the high table 😅 ... am hungry
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
Maybe some branches to make the tree bear fruits 🍎
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
Very cool and interesting post. Absolute power corrupts absolutely!
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
The real question is not whether one company can dominate everything, but what capabilities would make Tangled indispensable for every form of digital communication. If it can connect humans, AI, and systems seamlessly, understand context, and communicate across every platform, Tangled could become the universal communication layer.
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
First:
Everyone would be able to write in their own language, and the system would simply translate it into the language of the user reading it. That would eliminate all language barriers. It would be like an AI interpreter.

Second:
What said is very important: People need to be able to trust the platform. Freedom of expression, no sharing of user data with prying authorities, truly being transparent—so that every user knows: Okay, I can trust Tangled. I don’t have to hide there; I can just be myself. 
(Of course, this excludes criminal offenses—within the bounds of common sense—though the EU often considers the mere expression of an opinion to be a criminal offense. Or China, for example.)

Third:
Tangled needs to be more user-friendly. It’s great for computer scientists, but it’s not intuitive enough for the average user. However, this is also difficult because Tangled is complex and extensive. One idea here would be to place small info “I” icons (the little circles with an “I” inside) at appropriate locations so that a brief explanation appears when the mouse hovers over them...and, if necessary, include a link to an FAQ section where the feature is described in more detail. This way, users can view information about specific functions at any point without having to search for it.

That's what comes to mind right off the bat....
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
If Tangled wants to be the only digital communication tool, it would need to become the universal language and connection layer for humans and AI. Technology aside, I think Tangled would need one essential thing: trust. If people trust the platform to connect them authentically, everything else can grow from there. Tangled would need to make digital communication so easy and natural that people simply wouldn’t want to go anywhere else. 
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
I love that!
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
That would be an Orwellian nightmare.
badge
$0 earned1mo ago
I think the people leading companies like Anthropic agree. They are motivated to go all-in to build it because they have a missionary complex and believe only their vision will be beneficial and fear being subjugated to anyone else's solution.