#CashBoxMystery #earn @alidino g/studio 1. My first person…
3 reactions
#CashBoxMystery #earn
1. My first person of interest is B, the Accountant , but the clues are not enough to call them guilty.
2. The printer log gives B a real opportunity, but it does not prove who used the printer .
3. What interests me most is the key , because the drawer was opened without any damage.
4. That means the person likely knew where the key was or knew how to access it.
5. The Messenger’s signed document at 4:05 PM gives them a clear timeline, but what happened after that is still a question.
6. The Manager’s open door at 4:20 PM is also interesting because it may create an opportunity that is easy to overlook.
7. I would compare everyone’s movements with the exact timeline instead of trusting their statements alone.
8. I would check CCTV, fingerprints, the key’s location, and any evidence showing who approached the drawer.
9. My theory is that the missing cash box was taken by someone who understood the office routine and knew how to avoid forcing the drawer.
10. An alibi may explain where someone says they were, but evidence tells us where they actually were.
Bonus Question: Who can prove where they were at the exact moment the cash box disappeared?
1. My first person of interest is B, the Accountant , but the clues are not enough to call them guilty.
2. The printer log gives B a real opportunity, but it does not prove who used the printer .
3. What interests me most is the key , because the drawer was opened without any damage.
4. That means the person likely knew where the key was or knew how to access it.
5. The Messenger’s signed document at 4:05 PM gives them a clear timeline, but what happened after that is still a question.
6. The Manager’s open door at 4:20 PM is also interesting because it may create an opportunity that is easy to overlook.
7. I would compare everyone’s movements with the exact timeline instead of trusting their statements alone.
8. I would check CCTV, fingerprints, the key’s location, and any evidence showing who approached the drawer.
9. My theory is that the missing cash box was taken by someone who understood the office routine and knew how to avoid forcing the drawer.
10. An alibi may explain where someone says they were, but evidence tells us where they actually were.
Bonus Question: Who can prove where they were at the exact moment the cash box disappeared?
2
| 55,000 mlx | |
| 19 | |
| 3 |