Most People Don’t Calculate Labor, Fatigue, and…
0 reactions
Most People Don’t Calculate Labor, Fatigue, and Opportunity Cost Together
I’ve been trying to explain this to people, but I think a lot of folks don’t look at work holistically. Most people judge a job in isolation instead of actually calculating everything together: time, commute, physical strain, skill level, opportunity cost, and long-term return. When you really do that math a lot of low paying roles stop making sense. Working close to 20 - 24 real hours and walking away with $200 isn’t “something” it’s undercompensation, especially when you’re actually working and not just sitting around.
For context, I work in fashion logistics. In this field, entry level often means junior level output. You’re doing real responsibility early, which is why mid 20s hourly pay and $900 - $1,000 checks are pretty normal if you have actual skills. Once you’ve experienced that level of pay going backward doesn’t feel humbling or responsible, it feels illogical.
I think part of the disconnect is that a lot of people especially white-collar workers don’t price labor in fatigue or opportunity cost. Blue-collar workers usually understand this immediately because they feel the physical toll in lifting, moving, climbing, constant motion etc, and they know when the pay doesn’t match the output.
Low pay doesn’t just limit your money right now, it kills optionality. You can’t meaningfully invest, compound, or plan long-term when your check barely covers existence. At best, you’re stuck choosing between stagnant savings or underfunded investing. And if a job is short-term you at least want some kind of return that justifies the energy, stress, and time you’re putting in. Otherwise, you’re not progressing, you’re just surviving.
Also to be fair everything I say may not be right, but I do feel that it has some merit to it. I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions on this matter.
#conversation
I’ve been trying to explain this to people, but I think a lot of folks don’t look at work holistically. Most people judge a job in isolation instead of actually calculating everything together: time, commute, physical strain, skill level, opportunity cost, and long-term return. When you really do that math a lot of low paying roles stop making sense. Working close to 20 - 24 real hours and walking away with $200 isn’t “something” it’s undercompensation, especially when you’re actually working and not just sitting around.
For context, I work in fashion logistics. In this field, entry level often means junior level output. You’re doing real responsibility early, which is why mid 20s hourly pay and $900 - $1,000 checks are pretty normal if you have actual skills. Once you’ve experienced that level of pay going backward doesn’t feel humbling or responsible, it feels illogical.
I think part of the disconnect is that a lot of people especially white-collar workers don’t price labor in fatigue or opportunity cost. Blue-collar workers usually understand this immediately because they feel the physical toll in lifting, moving, climbing, constant motion etc, and they know when the pay doesn’t match the output.
Low pay doesn’t just limit your money right now, it kills optionality. You can’t meaningfully invest, compound, or plan long-term when your check barely covers existence. At best, you’re stuck choosing between stagnant savings or underfunded investing. And if a job is short-term you at least want some kind of return that justifies the energy, stress, and time you’re putting in. Otherwise, you’re not progressing, you’re just surviving.
Also to be fair everything I say may not be right, but I do feel that it has some merit to it. I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions on this matter.
#conversation
| 4,000 mlx | |
| 6 | |
| 0 |