The "rules" for being a good conversationalist are a…
0 reactions
The "rules" for being a good conversationalist are a paradox and they're making us worse at talking to people
We've been overloaded with social advice to the point where it's a complete contradiction.
I keep hearing that in a conversation, you should: make eye contact (but not too much), practice active listening, match the other person's energy(70%), try to understand the other person, wait three seconds before replying, don't interrupt, mirror their body language, ask open-ended questions… and like a dozen other things.
But then, the biggest rule of all is "focus entirely on the conversation and just be present."
How? How do I do both? I can't be genuinely present and listening if my brain is running a 15-point checklist in the background. It's like the centipede's dilemma—the moment you start consciously thinking about which leg to move, you trip over all of them.
This is an impossible demand. You cannot consciously run a complex algorithm of social behaviors and be authentic at the same time. The rules turn a natural human connection into a performance I'm terrified of failing. I feel like I have to choose between being a checklist-following robot or being genuinely present, but the advice never acknowledges that you literally cannot do both at once.
Does this contradiction drive anyone else insane, or has anyone actually found a way around it?
#relationships
source
We've been overloaded with social advice to the point where it's a complete contradiction.
I keep hearing that in a conversation, you should: make eye contact (but not too much), practice active listening, match the other person's energy(70%), try to understand the other person, wait three seconds before replying, don't interrupt, mirror their body language, ask open-ended questions… and like a dozen other things.
But then, the biggest rule of all is "focus entirely on the conversation and just be present."
How? How do I do both? I can't be genuinely present and listening if my brain is running a 15-point checklist in the background. It's like the centipede's dilemma—the moment you start consciously thinking about which leg to move, you trip over all of them.
This is an impossible demand. You cannot consciously run a complex algorithm of social behaviors and be authentic at the same time. The rules turn a natural human connection into a performance I'm terrified of failing. I feel like I have to choose between being a checklist-following robot or being genuinely present, but the advice never acknowledges that you literally cannot do both at once.
Does this contradiction drive anyone else insane, or has anyone actually found a way around it?
#relationships
source
| 4,000 mlx | |
| 5 | |
| 0 |