Is QM at a stalemate? Hi, I am currently reading about the…
0 reactions
Is QM at a stalemate?
Hi,
I am currently reading about the single slit experiment. I’ve understood that the schrodinger equation is essentially solid maths that describes the experiments like single slit extremely well.
Then there’s the various interpretations that try to explain what the schrodinger equation is in physical reality.
However, we have multiple interpretations that all use the same mathematical framework. How can 1 mathematical framework give rise to multiple interpretations?
Only one interpretation can be correct. But they all seem to use the maths extremely well making them almost indistinguishable in terms of who’s correct.
Have I missed something or is this correct?
My goal was to figure out why when fired one at a time the particle appears as a dot despite the probability’s being spread out like a wave.
#science
source
Hi,
I am currently reading about the single slit experiment. I’ve understood that the schrodinger equation is essentially solid maths that describes the experiments like single slit extremely well.
Then there’s the various interpretations that try to explain what the schrodinger equation is in physical reality.
However, we have multiple interpretations that all use the same mathematical framework. How can 1 mathematical framework give rise to multiple interpretations?
Only one interpretation can be correct. But they all seem to use the maths extremely well making them almost indistinguishable in terms of who’s correct.
Have I missed something or is this correct?
My goal was to figure out why when fired one at a time the particle appears as a dot despite the probability’s being spread out like a wave.
#science
source
| 1,000 mlx | |
| 2 | |
| 0 |