0 reactions
What are your guys' thoughts on Sarkar's paper which suggests that dark energy doesn't exist but is an artifact of how we adjust for the movement of our own galaxy when making measurements of red shift in light?
I'm sorry if my interpretation of the paper is not correct and feel free to correct me but from what I gather Sarkar is saying that the super novae data which originally provided evidence for dark energy had been adjusted incorrectly, when he used the raw data and correctly adjusted for non-uniformities in the sky he found that it was more consistent with a non expanding universe and the red shifts in light were better explained as an artifact of the movement of our own galaxy.
#science
source
I'm sorry if my interpretation of the paper is not correct and feel free to correct me but from what I gather Sarkar is saying that the super novae data which originally provided evidence for dark energy had been adjusted incorrectly, when he used the raw data and correctly adjusted for non-uniformities in the sky he found that it was more consistent with a non expanding universe and the red shifts in light were better explained as an artifact of the movement of our own galaxy.
#science
source
| 10,000 mlx | |
| 10 | |
| 0 |