7 reactions
#PoliticalSundayXXI
and
#PublicDisplayofAffection
🦠 PDA During the COVID-19 Pandemic
1. PDA as Healthy for a Relationship? (Scene 1: A and B)
From the perspective of A and B, even during the pandemic, PDA can be emotionally necessary, but its public display is heavily cautioned against and potentially reckless.
Emotional Need (Yes): The need for physical touch and affection after a long separation would be magnified due to the stress, isolation, and uncertainty of the pandemic. The physical reunion (hug, kiss) would release vital hormones (like oxytocin) to reduce stress and validate the emotional connection, making it psychologically healthy for the relationship itself.
Public Display (No/Risky): The passionate hug and kiss in the airport (a high-traffic, enclosed public space) would be seen as a direct violation of crucial minimum public health standards (MPHS), specifically social distancing and the avoidance of non-essential close contact (kissing being a high-risk activity for droplet transmission).
Opinion: While their love is healthy, the spontaneous, visible, and high-risk nature of the PDA in a public space like an airport is socially irresponsible during a pandemic.
2. (a) Educating Kids on PDA During the Pandemic (Scene 1)
If I were the parent, the education would center entirely on health, safety, and responsibility, rather than just love and boundaries.
Explain the Risk: I would explain that the people love each other very much, but right now, there is a sickness (the virus) that spreads when people touch, hug, or kiss, especially those who don't live in the same house.
Contrast Private vs. Public: I would clarify, "When they get home and are isolated together, they can hug all they want because they are a single household. But in a public place like this, we have to keep our distance, even from people we love, to protect them and others."
Reinforce Protocol: This situation would be used to reinforce our family's adherence to safety protocols (wearing masks, maintaining distance) by pointing out that the couple is violating the rules, thereby putting others at risk. The lesson becomes one of collective responsibility: "We wear our masks and keep our distance not just for ourselves, but for everyone around us, especially Lolo and Lola (grandparents)."
2. (b) Scene 2: Nina and Melay PDA During the Pandemic
Yes, it is still a Public Display of Affection (PDA), and it is strongly discouraged by health and law enforcement guidelines.
Fulfillment of PDA Rule (Yes): The action is kissing, which meets the rule's definition of an act of intimacy visible to others, regardless of gender.
Compliance with COVID-19 Rules (No): Law enforcement guidelines in the Philippines during certain periods of the pandemic specifically stated that acts like kissing, embracing, and holding hands in public were a "no-no" and grounds for a caution or warning, as they violated the one-meter physical distancing rule. The authorities explicitly stated they would not stop to ask if the individuals were a couple or lived in the same house; the physical proximity was the automatic violation.
Conclusion: Whether heterosexual or same-sex, the action is PDA, and during the pandemic, it represented a clear breach of health protocols designed to prevent virus spread.
3. Causes of Public Display/s of Affection During the Pandemic
While the basic causes of PDA (emotional connection, pride, etc.) remained, the pandemic added new, distinct causes:
The Emotional Release Valve (Primary Cause): The intense stress, uncertainty, and isolation caused by the pandemic led to a greater need for emotional grounding. PDA served as a powerful, instant release and affirmation that the partner is physically present and safe.
Defiance or Fatigue: After months of restrictions, some people experienced "pandemic fatigue." PDA became a subconscious act of defiance against the stifling restrictions or a sign that the couple no longer prioritized the risk above their personal need for connection.
Affirmation of Household Unit: For couples who lived together, minor PDA (like a quick hug) in public simply reflected the comfort and lack of distancing they practiced at home. They may have forgotten or ignored the need to "act distant" in public.
4. Allowing Partner to Kiss You in Public During the Pandemic
My response would likely be "No, not a kiss," but I would find an alternative.
Reason for "No": I would not allow a public kiss because kissing is the most direct way to exchange respiratory droplets, posing the highest risk of viral transmission. Allowing it would be an act of disregard for community health and an explicit violation of public safety warnings.
Alternative Allowed: I would substitute the kiss with a safer, non-contact expression of affection that still fulfills the emotional need:
A hand squeeze (if hands are sanitized).
A loving look and a verbal affirmation ("I love you, let's wait until we get home").
A hand placed gently on the back (through clothing, minimizing direct contact, but maintaining distance from the face).
-
The choice is driven by the fact that during the pandemic, social responsibility takes precedence over spontaneous personal expression in high-risk scenarios.
and
#PublicDisplayofAffection
🦠 PDA During the COVID-19 Pandemic
1. PDA as Healthy for a Relationship? (Scene 1: A and B)
From the perspective of A and B, even during the pandemic, PDA can be emotionally necessary, but its public display is heavily cautioned against and potentially reckless.
Emotional Need (Yes): The need for physical touch and affection after a long separation would be magnified due to the stress, isolation, and uncertainty of the pandemic. The physical reunion (hug, kiss) would release vital hormones (like oxytocin) to reduce stress and validate the emotional connection, making it psychologically healthy for the relationship itself.
Public Display (No/Risky): The passionate hug and kiss in the airport (a high-traffic, enclosed public space) would be seen as a direct violation of crucial minimum public health standards (MPHS), specifically social distancing and the avoidance of non-essential close contact (kissing being a high-risk activity for droplet transmission).
Opinion: While their love is healthy, the spontaneous, visible, and high-risk nature of the PDA in a public space like an airport is socially irresponsible during a pandemic.
2. (a) Educating Kids on PDA During the Pandemic (Scene 1)
If I were the parent, the education would center entirely on health, safety, and responsibility, rather than just love and boundaries.
Explain the Risk: I would explain that the people love each other very much, but right now, there is a sickness (the virus) that spreads when people touch, hug, or kiss, especially those who don't live in the same house.
Contrast Private vs. Public: I would clarify, "When they get home and are isolated together, they can hug all they want because they are a single household. But in a public place like this, we have to keep our distance, even from people we love, to protect them and others."
Reinforce Protocol: This situation would be used to reinforce our family's adherence to safety protocols (wearing masks, maintaining distance) by pointing out that the couple is violating the rules, thereby putting others at risk. The lesson becomes one of collective responsibility: "We wear our masks and keep our distance not just for ourselves, but for everyone around us, especially Lolo and Lola (grandparents)."
2. (b) Scene 2: Nina and Melay PDA During the Pandemic
Yes, it is still a Public Display of Affection (PDA), and it is strongly discouraged by health and law enforcement guidelines.
Fulfillment of PDA Rule (Yes): The action is kissing, which meets the rule's definition of an act of intimacy visible to others, regardless of gender.
Compliance with COVID-19 Rules (No): Law enforcement guidelines in the Philippines during certain periods of the pandemic specifically stated that acts like kissing, embracing, and holding hands in public were a "no-no" and grounds for a caution or warning, as they violated the one-meter physical distancing rule. The authorities explicitly stated they would not stop to ask if the individuals were a couple or lived in the same house; the physical proximity was the automatic violation.
Conclusion: Whether heterosexual or same-sex, the action is PDA, and during the pandemic, it represented a clear breach of health protocols designed to prevent virus spread.
3. Causes of Public Display/s of Affection During the Pandemic
While the basic causes of PDA (emotional connection, pride, etc.) remained, the pandemic added new, distinct causes:
The Emotional Release Valve (Primary Cause): The intense stress, uncertainty, and isolation caused by the pandemic led to a greater need for emotional grounding. PDA served as a powerful, instant release and affirmation that the partner is physically present and safe.
Defiance or Fatigue: After months of restrictions, some people experienced "pandemic fatigue." PDA became a subconscious act of defiance against the stifling restrictions or a sign that the couple no longer prioritized the risk above their personal need for connection.
Affirmation of Household Unit: For couples who lived together, minor PDA (like a quick hug) in public simply reflected the comfort and lack of distancing they practiced at home. They may have forgotten or ignored the need to "act distant" in public.
4. Allowing Partner to Kiss You in Public During the Pandemic
My response would likely be "No, not a kiss," but I would find an alternative.
Reason for "No": I would not allow a public kiss because kissing is the most direct way to exchange respiratory droplets, posing the highest risk of viral transmission. Allowing it would be an act of disregard for community health and an explicit violation of public safety warnings.
Alternative Allowed: I would substitute the kiss with a safer, non-contact expression of affection that still fulfills the emotional need:
A hand squeeze (if hands are sanitized).
A loving look and a verbal affirmation ("I love you, let's wait until we get home").
A hand placed gently on the back (through clothing, minimizing direct contact, but maintaining distance from the face).
-
The choice is driven by the fact that during the pandemic, social responsibility takes precedence over spontaneous personal expression in high-risk scenarios.
3
2
2
45 reactions
ACTIVITY I
#PoliticalSundayXXI #earn activity by
Topic: "Separation of Church and the State"
Grand Total : 16, 800, 000
Details:
( 400 x 15 = 6, 000, 000 )
( 300 x 7 = 2, 100, 000 )
(200 x 29 = 5, 800, 000 )
( 1, 000, 000 x 1 =1,000,000 )
( 500 x 3 = 1, 500,000 )
( 400 x 1 = 400, 000 )
Attached is the link of payments and or tips purposes:
https://tangled.com/c/b8ad3bae3762e8d06872eed7ba49c1ea817c926bf
A. Answer through Video - 400k
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Answer with selfie - 300k
16 .
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Answer with memes :
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Most unique answer with convictions are the following:
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
ACTIVITY II
#TheaterartsXI #earn activity
Theme: #selfiewithmyfavoritefruit
Grand Total : 7, 800, 000
Details:
( 200 x 40 = 7, 800, 000 )
Attached is the link for tips and or payment references:
https://tangled.com/c/b8ad3bae38dab9bbe7078564c872345e480ec72c3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38 .
39.
Thanks to all who went and participated..
Snappy Salute !!!
Thanks much and c ya around!!!
Again this is me the not so mean demigoddess
Everyone... Kindly comment " Thank you
#PoliticalSundayXXI #earn activity by
Topic: "Separation of Church and the State"
Grand Total : 16, 800, 000
Details:
( 400 x 15 = 6, 000, 000 )
( 300 x 7 = 2, 100, 000 )
(200 x 29 = 5, 800, 000 )
( 1, 000, 000 x 1 =1,000,000 )
( 500 x 3 = 1, 500,000 )
( 400 x 1 = 400, 000 )
Attached is the link of payments and or tips purposes:
https://tangled.com/c/b8ad3bae3762e8d06872eed7ba49c1ea817c926bf
A. Answer through Video - 400k
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Answer with selfie - 300k
16 .
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Answer with memes :
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Most unique answer with convictions are the following:
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
ACTIVITY II
#TheaterartsXI #earn activity
Theme: #selfiewithmyfavoritefruit
Grand Total : 7, 800, 000
Details:
( 200 x 40 = 7, 800, 000 )
Attached is the link for tips and or payment references:
https://tangled.com/c/b8ad3bae38dab9bbe7078564c872345e480ec72c3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38 .
39.
Thanks to all who went and participated..
Snappy Salute !!!
Thanks much and c ya around!!!
Again this is me the not so mean demigoddess
Everyone... Kindly comment " Thank you
20
3
3
20 reactions
#PoliticalSundayXXI #earn activity by
Here are answers according to my opinion
1. Yes, there was a violation because Mario’s influence as a respected Muslim official made people follow him in a political rally. Religion and government became mixed up.
2. Religion does not have the same level with the State. Religion is personal and spiritual, while the State governs all people. Both are important, but they must stay separate.
3. I will not join the rally, because mixing religion and politics can cause conflict. Supporting justice should be done in proper legal ways, not through religious influence.
4. It is very important to separate religion from the State. This avoids bias, conflict, and unfair laws. Keeping them apart ensures government stays fair and religion stays sacred.
5. Religion should come first because it guides morals and principles. It teaches us to love our country and respect the laws. Without faith, government may lack compassion. But religion also tells us to be good citizens, so loving the State comes naturally through faith.
6. The protest about lowering commodity prices is not enough reason for the President to resign. Prices are a serious issue, but they should be solved with proper policies, not by forcing resignation through rallies.
Here are answers according to my opinion
1. Yes, there was a violation because Mario’s influence as a respected Muslim official made people follow him in a political rally. Religion and government became mixed up.
2. Religion does not have the same level with the State. Religion is personal and spiritual, while the State governs all people. Both are important, but they must stay separate.
3. I will not join the rally, because mixing religion and politics can cause conflict. Supporting justice should be done in proper legal ways, not through religious influence.
4. It is very important to separate religion from the State. This avoids bias, conflict, and unfair laws. Keeping them apart ensures government stays fair and religion stays sacred.
5. Religion should come first because it guides morals and principles. It teaches us to love our country and respect the laws. Without faith, government may lack compassion. But religion also tells us to be good citizens, so loving the State comes naturally through faith.
6. The protest about lowering commodity prices is not enough reason for the President to resign. Prices are a serious issue, but they should be solved with proper policies, not by forcing resignation through rallies.
13
2