Here is my response on given questions ( scenes) in the activity.
1. Scene 1 In my opinion this was an accident, not negligence. The falling tree branch was an unexpected event that Scarletdoll could not reasonably predict or avoid. Losing the bill receipt was unrelated to the damage caused by the tree. 2. Scene 2 It may have been negligence if the blood and fingernail came from the chef due to poor hygiene. However, there is also a chance someone else tampered with the food before it reached the guest. Without a proper investigation, we cannot be completely certain what really happened. 3. Scene 3 The company owner,
could also share responsibility if proper testing or quality checks were ignored. My precaution would be to thoroughly test every bot before delivery, provide a warranty, and have a clear process for reporting and fixing defects.
Sometimes what happens isn’t just “bad luck”… sometimes it’s a lesson in responsibility. 🚨
From unexpected accidents to possible negligence, these real-life inspired scenarios (Scene 1, Scene 2 & Scene 3) make us think deeper about cause, responsibility, and consequences. 🤔
Watch my take as I break down each situation with my own understanding and perspective — no right or wrong, just real thoughts. 🎥
Here's my response Scene 1: I think it was an accident because the tree branch fell unexpectedly. The driver could not stop it from happening.
Scene 2: I think it may be negligence because food should be clean. But someone else could have caused it. The chef should be investigated first. There is not enough proof to blame only the chef. The hotel should find the real cause.