Stop being the product.
Become the owner.
or
sign uplog in

#HeartOverReceipts g/confessions g/studio #earn activity…

#HeartOverReceipts
     #earn activity
 
People often give each other gifts that feel valuable in relationships. This could be a phone, laptop, piece of jewelry, or even clothes, appliances, or money that meant a lot.

That question comes up quietly when the relationship ends:
Would I take it back? If I gave something, would I keep it, ask for it back, or just let it go?
 
This activity is about your opinion on "taking back what you've given," no matter how much money was involved. It's not about proving who's "right." It's about seeing how love changes your limits when it comes to money, feelings, and fairness.
 
TASK: Copy and answer the questions.
1. Have you ever given something valuable to someone in a relationship? Briefly explain what it was and why it felt important.
Β· β€œValuable” can mean  expensive  (like a gadget or jewelry) or just  emotionally meaningful  (like a gift you saved for, something you made, or something you really couldn’t afford but still gave).
2. If that relationship ended, would you want that thing back? Why or why not?
Β· If yes: What would make it feel fair to you to take it back?
Β· If no: What would stop you, even if it still has value?
3. Do you see gifts in relationships more like: love, investment, or a one‑time gift? Do you expect them to be β€œreturned” if things go wrong, or do you genuinely mean β€œyours to keep” when you give?
4. Are there conditions that would make you take back what you gave? Be honest about what you’d need to feel okay doing it.
5. What’s your general stand on β€œtaking back what you’ve given”?
Β· Do you think it’s understandable, fair, selfish, or heavily dependent on the situation?
Β· Does it depend more on the  value , the  length of the relationship , or  how things ended ?
6. If you received something valuable and later had to give it back, how would you feel?
Β·  Betrayed, relieved, annoyed, or indifferent?
Β· What would make it easier or harder to let it go?
 
ATTACHMENT: Kept, Taken, or Given
Draw 3 simple gift boxes, color and label them:
1. Green gift box: β€œKEPT BY ME”
- inside the box, draw and name that something you’d never take back even if a relationship ends
2. Blue gift box: β€œTAKEN BACK”
- inside the box, draw and name that something you’d be okay taking back if a relationship ends
3. Orange gift box: β€œGIVEN FREELY”
- inside the box, draw a heart and color it red
 
Written caption: β€œ Love gave me some things. Not every one of them has to be mine forever.”
Include and #HeartOverReceipts
 
Rules & Reminders:
- Pink/Grey BADGES  ( 5+ marketplace badges) only
- Be subscribed to and
- Post on your timeline, not inside this group. Tag #HeartOverReceipts + mention  and . 
- Reply here with post link to qualify. NO link / Deleted posts or comments = NO rewards.
- Respect other people’s shares! Keep it kind and from the heart! 
- I read submissions one by one, and I understand those copied or rephrased entries. If this happens again, you will be blocked and will no longer be able to participate in any future activities will host.
- Closes at 10 entries .
- Failure to follow any of the given rules may be subject to disqualification or deduction of rewards!
 
VERY VERY IMPORTANT NOTES FOR THIS ACTIVITY:
BASE REWARD is 300,000 MLX per participant. Duplicate entries won’t be entertained. 
1.    DISQUALIFICATION
Β· Posting inside the group.
Β· Entries out of topic
Β· NOT subscribed to upon checking.
Β· COPIED or REPHRASED entries
Β· Entries from someone with more than 1 Tangled account
2.    DEDUCTIONS
Β· 30k - Failure to include any or all of the ff: correct tag #HeartOverReceipts and mentions:  and
Β·  30k-100k - Failure to follow the post format and explain in complete thought
Β· 100k – Failure to follow the required attachment ( minor mistakes = deductions only )
3.    ALL deductions from rule-breakers will be split evenly among participants who followed every rule.
In cases where the deductions are significantly larger and the participants who followed the rules do not exceed half of the capped entries, a portion of the deduction will be allocated to standout entries. Meanwhile, those who complied with the rules will also receive their share.
 
 
loved
9
laughed
2
shocked
2
earnings
8,091,000 mlx total
$0  total
engagement
36 views
27 reactions

15 comments

$0 earned5mo ago
Thank you all for participating in the #HeartOverReceipts activity! Your openness and willingness to share your thoughts on the complexities of giving and receiving in relationships have made this activity truly enriching.

Navigating the emotional landscape of gifts and their significance can be challenging and your insights have illuminated how love intertwines with our perceptions of value, fairness, and attachment.

All rewards have been distributed to eligible entries. Out of the 10 submissions, only 2 adhered perfectly to the rules, while 8 incurred deductions for submitting answer-only entries along with the attachment, failing to respond thoughtfully to the tasks provided, and for various minor and major mistakes.

As a result, I got 450k mlx derived from deductions. 50%  (225k mlx) will be equally divided between and , who will each receive 112,500 mlx. The remaining 225k mlx (50%) will be shared among standout entries, with each receiving 45k mlx: and .

Deductions were applied for several reasons: answer-only submissions with correct attachments (-30k), misspelled words in the required statement on the attached image (-10k), and other issues related to attachments (color/label mistakes, incorrect usernames, and missing required statements). If you have any questions about where you may have gone wrong, I encourage you to reread my guidelines for clarification.
 

TOTAL PAY OUT: 3,000,000 MLX
badge
$0 earned5mo ago
TySm🌻
$0 earned5mo ago
ACTIVITY CLOSED! No longer accepting submissions as capped entries are already filled.
$0 earned5mo ago
1 MORE ENTRY
$0 earned5mo ago
This could have been perfect if you had double‑checked the required statement on the attachmentβ€”β€œforever” became β€œfoever.” Nevertheless, great entry!